Stage environments (or stages for short) are almost exact replicas of production environments for testing software. The purpose of staging environments is to test codes, builds, and updates under a production-like environment before deploying any application to ensure the quality of the application before it is deployed to the end user.
Therefore, it is necessary to replicate the hardware, servers, databases, and caches of the staging environment so that the staging environment has the same configuration. Furthermore, to ensure the software works correctly in the staging environment, everything should be as close as possible to what it is in the production environment.
Staging environments and their importance
Software deployment involves several steps: development, integration, testing and quality assurance, staging, and production. In an era when users have little patience for apps that do not perform as expected, finding bugs and software errors is crucial for ensuring smooth performance. The purpose of a staging environment is to test software at a level near production in an environment that is not in production and can lead to a higher level of confidence once the software is in production.
In staging environments, tests are conducted to ensure that production problems cannot occur and to prevent poor performance for the end user. As a result, there is a tendency for fewer fixes to be required as the application is deployed to a production environment.
Tests in staging
User acceptance testing (UAT) and smoke tests can be conducted in a staging environment. Testing essential service functionality is performed with smoke tests, while user acceptance testing is served from a user’s perspective with UAT tests. For example, a smoke test confirms that the main features of a new build still work correctly, and a UAT test ensures quality from the user’s perspective. Staging environments are used for testing since if there is a severe flaw in the system, it does not have to be shut down in production.
A staging environment can also be used to implement chaos engineering tests. The code is constantly broken through chaos engineering to reinforce confidence in the system. As a practice before implementing chaos engineering in production, chaos engineering can be started in a staging environment. Software issues in production systems can be identified earlier through chaos engineering.
Cloud computing allows for the creation of staging environments deployed into production environments. In addition, continuous delivery can be automated this way.
Staging environments limitations
Adding a staging environment to a system provides an extra layer of confidence. However, there are still some limitations. It is impossible to emulate every scenario in a staging environment, regardless of how well it replicates the production environment. The application can be tested under stress only after replicating high traffic volumes.
A poorly constructed or poorly utilized staging environment may cause more problems. For example, data gathered from replicated tests are inaccurate if the staging and production environments aren’t configured similarly.
Production environments could potentially release defects. For example, the staging environment should store code similarly to the production environment. There may be a difference in latency test results if that doesn’t happen.
Alternatives to staging
Staging is sometimes skipped entirely by some companies. Data from a production environment can be extracted, including information that cannot be accessed through the stage, such as traffic statistics. In comparison to copying, storing, and managing data from a staging environment, you can save time using data from the production environment.
For more articles of this type, you can check out Seahawk Media.