in Compare

Figma vs. WebFlow

Whether you are a product designer or UI developer, both are responsible for building products that provide solutions to users by evaluating specific business/market needs. Web designing is a crucial element of a product’s success, from conception to post-launch maintenance. 

Therefore, designers must choose the right spectrum of tools to design, develop, and deliver the best quality product. But, with varieties of tools available in the market, it can be a daunting task to decide which tools are perfect for picking.

The top two designing tools are Figma & Webflow, both fulfilling similar purposes regarding information architecture, visual design, and branding. Both the tools are tailored to the needs of user interface designers. But what unique features do both these design tools have? How do they differ from each other? We searched the internet for information and interviewed working professionals to answer these questions and more. The result? Read this comparison of Figma and Webflow that will assist you in deciding which design tool is the right pick for your next design project.

This blog will look at their differences and further explain which one is the right choice. So, without further ado, let’s dive in!

Introducing Figma & Webflow

Figma is the first prototyping & interface design tool with real-time collaboration that keeps everyone on the same page & works towards the same goal. Focus on the work rather than fighting your tools.

On the other hand, Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. The tool also includes clean code!

Best for designing: Figma 

Both Figma & WebFlow tools include structural elements (like artboards, grids, templates, and presets), reusable symbols or components, styles, and resource libraries, making them a powerful, modern design tool. Both Figma & Webflow supports nested elements and nested collection lists. Figma’s nested components let you place components within components, allowing designers to reduce the size of their features and structure their content in multiple ways. 

Webflow’s nested collection lists let you display one collection list within another collection list. This can be especially useful for adding and designing dynamic content from two collection lists.

Figma also has an advanced auto-layout feature and some outstanding editing and drawing tools in their unique vector networks feature. You can use Vector networks to create complex shapes. Figma’s unique vector networks features offer a much more agile workflow than drawing with conventional vector path tools.

Best for collaboration: Figma

Figma is the user interface design tool with the real-time collaboration feature. So, it’s no wonder to state that Figma stands alone in this category. Figma offers a fully-featured web client that makes collaboration features easy to access. 

Figma’s multiplayer mode has multi-user editing, commenting, platform diversity, team libraries, an observation mode, and automatic save and sync. 

Webflow is constantly refining its collaborative features to compete with Figma, but as of now, Figma is indeed the clear winner in this race!

Best for handoff: Figma

Figma also has design-to-code conversion options, generating and displaying CSS styles for web, Swift for iOS, and XML for Android. This can be helpful for developers to start after design handoffs. With a code tab on the right-hand panel, Figma makes its code suggestions extremely accessible. It also adjusts to design changes in real-time and has a comment mode feature that allows designers and developers to communicate more efficiently.

Note: Figma is not capable of generating the code base for a finished website or application. The generated code suggestions can only advance the development process by giving developers a starting point for their code.

Make a website without coding: Webflow

Webflow outstands from Figma! Because the primary purpose of the Webflow designing tool is to create fully-coded and fully functioning websites without the fuss of hiring designers or developers or messing around with code yourself. Instead of focusing on visual design to then hand off reference code to developers, Webflow combines visual and code development. Webflow’s UI corresponds straight to the HTML, and CSS works with your elements (e.g., links, texts, div blocks) on the left side and the CSS styling controls on the right. Front-end development becomes visual as you design, generating functioning code in real-time.

Best for sharing work with clients: Figma 

Sharing the work with our clients is an added challenge when we do it from a distance. Figma introduced an excellent tool that approaches client sharing via generated links transformed the lives of many to address this emerging issue. When your client clicks on the link, they’ll be redirected to a read-only version of your project that empowers you to control your client’s activities. With Figma, there’s no need to get into the hassle of screen sharing or passive click-through presentations; however, it streamlines the presentation process and improves the overall client’s experience.

Webflow also has sharing options designated for clients; however, Figma wins the race!

Best for a budget: Figma

Figma is power-packed with features which means it offers the most value in both their free and paid tiers regarding pricing plans. Though the paid option adds more value to your content when compared to other tools, including Webflow, the unpaid one does a pretty decent job.

Pros & Cons: Figma vs. Webflow

Pros of Figma

Cons of Figma

Pros of Webflow

Cons of Webflow

Sum Up

Figma and Webflow are, therefore, two design tools with incredible potential. They keep offering new features and improving existing ones, making it very difficult for designers to decide which one to use. 

Ultimately, it all depends on the preference of the designer. While some prefer plugins, others are more concerned with collaboration. Figma’s vector networks may be faster to draw and less rigorous and precise than any other design tool.

The choice between these two tools depends on the balance between performance, functionality, & features that it offers. It also depends on external factors such as the number of team members, the availability of operating systems, and collaboration capabilities.

Nevertheless, the Seahawk team always recommends you choose Figma for your next designing project! 

If you want to design and build your website, then get in touch with us! We can help!

REACH OUT

Writer and a Baker, working hard to earn the name and fame in the writing industry. Published 100's of articles and blogs for domestic and international clients.

Stay in the loop

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter for all the latest updates

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial